Kind of tired. School started today, and it has been a long day. I was looking up Phylicia Rishad on Wiki because she looks better now than she did on the Cosby Show and I started following links to links and thought, "My God, Wiki knows everything...what ambiguous term could I look up that Wiki wouldn't be able to lengthily define? Ah, 'friendship'!" So here I am. Wiki has amazed me once again. Not only is there a whole section of entries on "Close Relationships", but some of the information in the "Friendship" entry was just so amazing, I feel the need to record it before I go to bed.
The Wiki Entry According to a study documented in the June 2006 issue of the journal American Sociological Review, Americans are thought to be suffering a loss in the quality and quantity of close friendships since at least 1985. The study states 25% of Americans have no close confidants, and the average total number of confidants per citizen has dropped from four to two.
Amazing. So much of this resonated with me so strongly. I often find myself thinking of people and how we relate and socialize, and this confirmed a general feeling of decline I've always felt. In my insufficient experience, the life of my generation and the one that preceded it are incredibly different on a social level; with my parents describing to me a rich community full of family and friends that they were brought up in (yes, they may have been alcoholics as well, but that's besides the point). Certainly issues like Social Anxiety Disorder were less common, or at least less recognized. The invention of television and the modern demands of work certainly encourages solitude, almost as a prerequisite to productivity.
The entry then begins to discuss specifically interpersonal relationships between males.
The Danish sociologist Henning Bech, for instance, writes of the anxiety which often accompanies developing intimacy between male friends: "The more one has to assure oneself that one's relationship with another man is not homosexual, the more conscious one becomes that it might be, and the more necessary it becomes to protect oneself against it. The result is that friendship gradually becomes impossible."
More recently, the Austrian philosopher Otto Weininger claimed that:
"There is no friendship between men that has not an element of sexuality in it, however little accentuated it may be in the nature of the friendship, and however painful the idea of the sexual element would be. But it is enough to remember that there can be no friendship unless there has been some attraction to draw the men together. Much of the affection, protection, and nepotism between men is due to the presence of unsuspected sexual compatibility."
The title of this this journal is in reference to these theories. The idea that the existence of the homosexual man has killed male friendships, initially seems rather limited and almost perpetual of homophobia. However, I find these to be incredibly accurate, the latter less so, but it still proposes a logical point. As a gay guy I feel unable to connect with straight males, to the point that talking to them seems off-limits or I feel apologetic for myself. Almost as though their mere tolerance of my sexuality is worthy of admiration. When I came out to friends, I abandoned all ties with my straight friends and began to hang mainly with females. I regret this so much now, as I realize that I didn't even allow them to fail me; I was too afraid of rejection I dumped them first and rationalized that their friendships weren't much anyways. I feel I've made few mistakes in life in regard to my treatment of others, but recently I've come to realize the error.
In regards to the second excerpt, I think there is sexuality in attraction certainly to some small degree, but to propose that same-sex male friendships are broken because an internalized insecurity about insignificant homosexual inclinations seems far-fetched, although I believe at some point most gay guys find themselves praying on and preying on these human inclinations. I think the homophobia that kills the male bond lies not inside, but rather external perceptions and a fear of social repercussions of perceived homosexuality.
2am. This is so pointless, but I'm a geek and its exhilarating when you have these mushy notions that occupy your head for so long and you stumble across actual professionals who have taken these ambiguous feeling and transform them into concrete theories backed with citations and studies and all that good jazz. Besides, when I bring up these findings to some poor unsuspecting person, at least I'll have it here for reference.
I also really did kill one of the most meaningful and lengthy relationships I ever had a few weeks ago. But that's a story for another day. Also, what the hell? "Lengthily" is an actual word, it's an Americanism, whatever that means.